ࡱ>  =bjbjqq vee4+$;;;P;5(o5q5q5q5q5q5q57X:Rq5   q55vvv o5v o5vv2g4R6 ;C3[5505W3:>(:(g4:g4>,v$,q5q5f5    : : MSc Vet Epi: suggestions converting LSHTM grades to RVC grades Rory Donnelly, Quality Officer, LSHTM 22 June 2011 The following table suggests how grades awarded under the LSHTM grading system (whereby individual component grades are marked on a six-point integer grading scale, which may be combined into more fine-grained gradepoint averages) might be mapped to the RVC Common Grading Scheme (whereby grades are given against a seventeen-point grading scale, with associated percentages). One variation should be noted, regarding very good grades to better reflect the potentially very high standard of answers graded at this level within LSHTM, it is suggested that this be converted to 70% (as per previous Vet Epi regulations) rather than the standard 68% used for very good answers at RVC. LSHTM Integer Grade PointLSHTM descriptorCommonly associated GPA range (may vary for individual assessments)Related points on RVC Common Grading SchemeSuggested LSHTM-to-RVC conversion0Not submitted (null)n/aNo answer (0%)0 ( 0%0Very poor (fail)0.00 0.99Extremely poor answer (10%) Very poor answer (20%)0.01 to 0.49 ( 10% 0.50 to 0.99 ( 20%1Unsatisfactory / poor (fail)1.00 1.99Poor answer (30%) Clearly deficient answer (42%) Deficient answer (45%) Marginally deficient answer (48%)1.00 to 1.24 ( 30% 1.25 to 1.49 ( 42% 1.50 to 1.74 ( 45% 1.75 to 1.99 ( 48%2Satisfactory2.00 2.64Adequate answer (52%) Sound answer (55%) Very sound answer (58%)2.00 to 2.21 ( 52% 2.22 to 2.44 ( 55% 2.45 to 2.64 ( 58%3Good2.65 3.59Quite good answer (62%) Good answer (65%)2.65 to 3.14 ( 62% 3.15 to 3.59 ( 65%4Very good3.60 4.49Very good answer (68%)3.60 to 4.49 ( 70%5Excellent4.50 5.00Extremely good answer (75%) Excellent answer (85%) Outstanding answer (95%) Exceptional answer (100%)4.50 to 4.64 ( 75% 4.65 to 4.79 ( 85% 4.80 to 4.94 ( 95% 4.95 to 5.00 ( 100% To evidence why the preceding conversions should be appropriate, the following table compares the more detailed grade descriptors for RVC and LSHTM grades. RVC Mark descriptor and markRVC criteriaRVC postgrad classLSHTM descriptor and GPLSHTM criteriaLSHTM postgrad classNo answer (0%)Selection and coverage of material: Nothing presented or completely incorrect information or containing nothing at all of relevance. Understanding: None evident. No evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. Structure, clarity and presentation: None or extremely poor. FailNot submitted (0)Null mark may be given where work has not been submitted or attempted, or is in serious breach of assessment criteria/regulations. FailExtremely poor answer (10%)Selection and coverage of material: Hardly any information or information that is almost entirely incorrect or irrelevant. Understanding: No or almost no understanding evident. No, or almost no, evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. Structure, clarity and presentation: None or very poor. FailVery poor (0)Poor engagement with the topic, limited understanding, very poor argument & analysis. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: None of the major points present; many irrelevant points included and a serious lack of understanding. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: Some correct, essential part incorrect. FailVery poor answer (20%)Selection and coverage of material: Very limited amount of information that is correct and relevant. Understanding: If any, extremely limited evidence of understanding. No, or almost no, evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. Structure, clarity and presentation: Very poor. FailVery poor (0)FailPoor answer (30%)Selection and coverage of material: Little information that is correct and relevant. For projects, incomplete or inaccurate account of task with inadequate description of aims and methods of practical work and containing significant, and/or a large number of, errors. Understanding: If any, very limited evidence of understanding. There may be evidence of very limited wider reading of an appropriate nature. For projects, many unexplained observations or assertions likely; little or no evidence of original/innovative thinking; very limited reference to published work from authoritative sources. Structure, clarity and presentation: Poor. FailUnsatisfactory/ Poor (1)Inadequate engagement with the topic, gaps in understanding, poor argument & analysis. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: A few points are included, but lack of understanding is shown together with use of irrelevant points. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: Many correct but essential part (to be defined) incorrect or unknown.FailClearly deficient answer (42%)As for 45 but with a greater number, and/or more significant, omissions/inaccuracies/errors, flaws in understanding, presentation and/or communication of information. There may be less evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. FailUnsatisfactory/ Poor (1)FailDeficient answer (45%)Selection and coverage of material: Superficial coverage of topic that is descriptive and flawed by many important omissions and/or significant errors. For projects, also incomplete record of aims and methods of practical work, little comment on most observations. Understanding: Some evidence of understanding but not of original thought or critical analysis. Evidence of limited wider reading of an appropriate nature. For projects, likely to be inaccuracies in data analysis and/or interpretation and unexplained observations or assertions; little or no evidence of original/innovative thought; very limited reference to published work from authoritative sources. Structure, clarity and presentation: Some disorganisation in structure, lack of organisation, and deficiencies in clarity of expression. For projects, adequate although may not be entirely systematic. FailUnsatisfactory/ Poor (1)FailMarginally deficient answer (48%)As for 45 but with fewer, and/or less significant, omissions/inaccuracies/errors, flaws in understanding, presentation and/or communication of information. There may be more evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. FailUnsatisfactory/ Poor (1)FailAdequate answer (52%)As for 55 but with more numerous, and/or more significant omissions/inaccuracies/errors, flaws in understanding, presentation and/or communication of information. There may be less evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. PassSatisfactory (2)Adequate evidence of engagement with the topic but some gaps in understanding or insight, routine argument & analysis, and may have some inaccuracies or omissions. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: Sufficient relevant information is included but not all major points are discussed, and there may be some errors of interpretation. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: Essential parts correct (to be defined), some incorrect.PassSound answer (55%)Selection and coverage of material: Basic coverage of main aspects of topic but with some significant omissions/inaccuracies/errors. For projects, systematic account of task with adequate record of aims and methods of practical work and no significant errors, omissions or inaccuracies; but appropriate speculation is unlikely or, if present, is likely to be unsubstantiated. Understanding: Statements supported by facts but limited evidence of critical ability or powers of argument. Evidence of sufficient wider reading of an appropriate nature. For projects, sufficient reference to published work from authoritative sources; data are largely accurate but there may be some unexplained observations or assertions; limited evidence of original/innovative thought. Structure, clarity and presentation: In general, (reasonably) organised and logical presentation with adequate clarity of expression. PassSatisfactory (2)PassVery sound answer (58%)As for 55 but with fewer, and/or less significant omissions/inaccuracies/errors and more evidence of critical ability and/or powers of argument and clarity of expression. There may be more evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. PassSatisfactory (2)PassQuite good answer (62%)As for 65 but with more, and/or more significant, omissions/inaccuracies/errors and less evidence of critical ability/judgement. There may be less evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. PassGood (3)Adequate evidence of engagement with the topic but some gaps in understanding or insight, routine argument & analysis, and may have some inaccuracies or omissions. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: The major points are discussed, but relevant, though less important considerations, are omitted. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: Most correct, a few incorrect allowed.PassGood answer (65%)Selection and coverage of material: Good coverage of relevant material and clear evidence of critical judgement in selection of information. Few or no significant omissions or errors. For projects, systematic and accurate account of task with full record of aims and methods of practical work and no significant errors or omissions; some speculation, where appropriate, but may not be fully supported. Understanding: Thorough grasp of concepts and evidence of synthesis of information and critical ability. Evidence of sufficient, or some more extensive, wider reading of an appropriate nature. For projects, reasonable comment on all observations with few unexplained findings or assertion; some evidence of original/innovative thinking; appropriate reference to published work from authoritative sources; data manipulated and analysed correctly. Structure, clarity and presentation: Logical and organised structure with clarity of expression. MeritGood (3)Pass (there is no merit option)Very good answer (68%)As for 65 but with fewer, and/or less significant, omissions/inaccuracies/errors. More evidence of critical judgement likely. There may be more evidence of wider reading of an appropriate nature. MeritVery good (4)Very good engagement with the topic, very good depth of understanding & insight, very good argument & analysis. This work may be borderline distinction standard. Note that very good work may have some inaccuracies or omissions but not enough to question the understanding of the subject matter. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: A full discussion of the topic that includes all relevant information and critical evaluation. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: Almost all correct, none incorrect.Pass (there is no merit option)Extremely good answer (75%)Selection and coverage of material: Question answered fully and accurately. Few errors and/or omissions and none of significance. For projects, full and accurate account of task, aims and methods of practical work with few errors and/or omissions and none of significance; where appropriate, sensible speculation, supported by evidence. Understanding: Thorough grasp of concepts with evidence of powers of critical analysis, argument and original thinking . Evidence of extensive wider reading of an appropriate nature. For projects, also some critical and/or comparative comment on all observations; clear evidence of original/innovative thinking; published work from authoritative sources used extensively and appropriately; data manipulated and analysed correctly. Structure, clarity and presentation: Logical and organised structure with clarity of expression. For projects, very well organised. DistinctionExcellent (5)Excellent engagement with the topic, excellent depth of understanding & insight, excellent argument & analysis. Generally, this work will be distinction standard. NB that excellent work does not have to be outstanding or exceptional by comparison with other students; these grades should not be capped to a limited number of students per class. Nor should such work be expected to be 100% perfect some minor inaccuracies or omissions may be permissible. Simple general criteria for qualitative work: A comprehensive discussion of the topic giving all relevant information, showing in-depth critical understanding of the topic, going beyond conventional answers, and bringing in additional relevant ideas or material. Simple general criteria for quantitative work: All correct.DistinctionExcellent answer (85%)As for 75 but demonstrating an authoritative grasp of concepts with sustained powers of argument, and frequent insights (and for projects, much evidence of original/innovative thinking). Virtually no errors or omissions and none of significance.DistinctionExcellent (5)DistinctionOutstanding answer (95%)As for 85 but with strong evidence of independent thinking throughout and no omissions or factual errors. For projects, also original/innovative thinking, and would be of publishable standard with only minor modifications to content.DistinctionExcellent (5)DistinctionExceptional answer (100%)Selection and coverage of material: Exceptional depth of coverage with no identifiable errors or omissions. Understanding: Exceptional powers of analysis, argument, synthesis and insight. Considerable evidence of extensive wider reading of an appropriate nature. Structure, clarity and presentation: Flawless. For projects, of publishable standard with only amendments in style/formatting required. DistinctionExcellent (5)Distinction      PAGE 6 of  NUMPAGES 6  ?stu & ' ( ijuudP?-#h_5hIL:CJOJQJ^JaJ hMhMCJOJQJ^JaJ&hnhg 6CJOJQJ]^JaJ hnhnCJOJQJ^JaJ hnhQ9CJOJQJ^JaJ hnhg CJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJh>CJOJQJ^JaJ h9h9CJOJQJ^JaJ&hMhM6CJOJQJ]^JaJ#h:R5>*CJOJQJ\^JaJ)hMhM5>*CJOJQJ\^JaJ?uv ' ( B S <<$Ifgd_5 & FgdQ9gdFgdMgd:R        7 j w x | } & 4 5 9 : H I \ ] p q v w 봡봡봡Ȁ뀴봡Ȁl'h_5hF:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ'h_5h|Ma:CJOJPJQJ^JaJh_5hILCJ^JaJ% jh_5h:R:OJPJQJ^J'h_5h:R:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ#h_5hIL:CJOJQJ^JaJ h_5hILCJOJQJ^JaJ'h_5hIL:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ) kd$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t20944 lalp2yt_5     & F<<$Ifgd_5 <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5   + 7 L</< <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5kdF$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_57 S j } .kd$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_5 <<$Ifgd_5 & F<<$Ifgd_5  & : N b v  & F<<$Ifgd_5 <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5 v w y L</< <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5kd$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_5  <<$Ifgd_5 & F<<$Ifgd_5  #:;[\`aopuvEFJKNװzװװ׌zװzװװ#h_5hIL:CJOJQJ^JaJ h_5hILCJOJQJ^JaJ% jh_5hg :OJPJQJ^J'h_5hIL:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ% jh_5h:R:OJPJQJ^J'h_5h:R:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ'h_5hg :CJOJPJQJ^JaJ)#L</< <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5kd$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_5#;Mauv.kd$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_5 <<$Ifgd_5 & F<<$Ifgd_5vx & F<<$Ifgd_5 <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5L</< <<$Ifgd_5$<<$Ifa$gd_5kdQ$$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_58K^q <<$Ifgd_5 & F<<$Ifgd_5NOUWXY`bkl~#$%)8ABGNOabyz׳vdvdUvdvdUvhF5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhwrq5CJOJQJ^JaJhwrq5CJOJQJ^JaJhFhILCJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJ h_5hILCJOJQJ^JaJ% jh_5h:R:OJPJQJ^J'h_5h:R:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ'h_5hD:CJOJPJQJ^JaJ$%BOLGGGG>> $Ifgdg gdFkd $$IflrT,0*9T  ,x t0944 lalyt_5Obz3`af ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg Fft $Ifgdg z3@B̽zi[J hhCJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhwrq6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhwrq5CJOJQJ^JaJhwrqCJOJQJ^JaJ hhwrqCJOJQJ^JaJhwrq5CJOJQJ^JaJhF5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhwrq5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhF5CJOJQJ^JaJ"_`aeg|  yz´rcrcQrc@ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhwrqCJOJQJ^JaJhFCJOJQJ^JaJ h:&h:&CJOJQJ^JaJhwrqCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJfg8/ $Ifgdg kd $$IflֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalz   $Ifgd:& $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  K   &'IK:<MZ[\`mstعyygyVy hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hh:&CJOJQJ^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ!'7. $Ifgdg kd $$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal'GHM[\a $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg abt7. $Ifgdg kd $$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalt lv{ $Ifgd:& $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg   MPkl/0uvz߿߮їxxgU#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJ hh:&CJOJQJ^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ hg hg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ{|7. $Ifgdg kd $$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg ]qkyz|a)*1IJKOlrsW ] u v w { }!!!!7"оооНЌНЌ hg hg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ77. $Ifgdg kd|$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalb+,1AJKP $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  PQs7. $Ifgdg kdy$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalsW X ] m v w | $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg | } 7. $Ifgdg kdv$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal }!~!!!8"9""T#Y# $Ifgd:& $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  7"8"9"g"""##S#T#X#f#l#m####$$$$$$Q%R%%%%%8&;&j&o&&&&&''ͼ伫yygy#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hg h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ&Y#Z#m#7. $Ifgdg kds$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalm#$k&&&&' '' $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg ' ' ' '&'''( (0(1(2(6(I(O(P((()))&)')))))Z*[*********ооᡊyyh hh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ#''''7. $Ifgdg kdp$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal''(( (1(2(7( $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg 7(8(P(7. $Ifgdg kdm$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lalP()))')))[*** $Ifgd:& $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  ***7. $Ifgdg kdj$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal***++,,[,i,k,-+-|------.=.?........../////00ͿͿͿͿͿͿͿͮ͝}n] hhCJOJQJ^JaJh6CJOJQJ^JaJ#hh6CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ$*\,.{.|..... $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg ...7. $Ifgdg kdg$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal.////A000T111 $Ifgd:& & F$Ifgdg  $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  000S1T111111111122e2u22253B3D33333<4?4ʹ{iZ{{iZH{{#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ hh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ1118/ $Ifgdg kdd$$IflֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal1534i5j5v55)6P7Q7X888 & F$Ifgd:& $Ifgd:& $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg  ?4l4o444445 5E5S5T5U5v555O7P7Q77W8X88888888/9ϽxgxgV hh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hP+5h:&CJOJQJ^JaJ,h:&h:&56CJOJQJ\]^JaJh:&CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ8887. $Ifgdg kdY$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal/9C9o9q999999999X:::::::;;;=;?;;;;!<"<)<G<P<`<<<<<<<<<<ͿͮͿͿͮͿ͜͜ޜͿͿ|umimhf jhf U hMh hhg CJOJQJ^JaJhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 5CJOJQJ^JaJ hg hg CJOJQJ^JaJhg CJOJQJ^JaJ hhg CJOJQJ^JaJ#hhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJhg 6CJOJQJ^JaJ)899999 & F$Ifgdg  $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg 9997. $Ifgdg kdV$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal9::::; & F$Ifgdg  $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg ;;;7. $Ifgdg kdS$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal;;"<<<<<<< & F$Ifgdg  $Ifgdg  ]>U"p#'$Ifgdg <<<<<<72000gd:RkdP$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t0:644 lal<<<<<<<<<=gd:R$a$gd9 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<=ݵݵݤ hMhhQ9 h9hQ9CJOJQJ^JaJ)hHP0JCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu$h9hQ90JCJOJQJ^JaJ-jh9hQ90JCJOJQJU^JaJjhf Uhf 9&P 1h0:pILA .!n"n#n$n% 9&P 1h0:pILA .!n"n#n$n% D$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t209,5T5 5,5xalp2yt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5T5 5 5,5x#vT#v #v,#vx:V l t09,5T5 5,5xalyt_5$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t<0:6,5A515s555alp<kd$$Ifl4ֈAr$5:A1s t<0:644 lalp<$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l t0:6,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l t0:6,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555al$$Ifl!vh5A515s555#vA#v1#vs#v#v#v:V l4 t0:6+,5A515s555alb 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~PJ_HmH nH sH tH D`D g NormalCJ_HaJmH nHsH tHDA`D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List 44 9Header  !4 @4 9Footer  !.)@. 9 Page Number<< 9?3TOC 15;OJPJQJtH DT2D  Block Textx]^FF 9?3TOC 2 <<5CJOJPJQJtH FF 9?3TOC 3 <<:CJOJPJQJtH Z/bZ M 1Technical $1$a$ CJOJPJQJ_HmH sH tH B'qB MComment ReferenceCJaJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] 5; *********- Nz7"'*0?4/9<=!)/236;>EHNRUW_  7 v #vOf'at{Ps| Y#m#'''7(P(**..118899;;<<= "#$%&'(*+,-.0145789:<=?@ABCDFGIJKLMOPQSTVXYZ[\]^ %'-!8@0(  B S  ?/) 0)lU1),2)yg] (5s` (5?*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags stockticker8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsdate )2011226DayMonthYear HRS[444444444444444452A+4 $$++44444444445333333(SRSB3 Q a   ' H[\abtv{|,JKPQsXvw|}~TYZm' 7 8 P !'!""""|&&&&'' (A())F-i-j---).00001111112223334444444444444444444545h1v?%ECʃWJs|u]Y.$&o$ƶS~ . h^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^h`OJPJQJ^Jo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHee^e`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hHpp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hHh1S~v?WJ$&o]Y%Ew~        w~        w~        w~        w~        w~        N        76Bg a Mf :&v-p0Ib29?3_58Q9gBK9MXcP:RTj\`|Mae%phMnwrqQtF>}\8ILHPKeK9 ,;$cyPmXnDhb2{.44@5@UnknownG* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial;Wingdings;SimSun[SO9CG Times?= * Courier NewA BCambria Math"1hrGrG,_,_!nn24d44 3q HX)?gBK2!xx TQMSRDON Sandra Ward(       Oh+'0t  0 < HT\dl  TQMSRDON Normal.dotm Sandra Ward2Microsoft Office Word@@ @ ,՜.+,0 hp  0London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine_4  Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`bcdefghijklmnpqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry Fp? Data aM1Tableo:WordDocumentvSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q